ArticleJournal of Appalachian health2025
Radon Environmental Health Literacy among Health Council Participants in Northeast Tennessee.
Article in Journal of Appalachian health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Radon, a radioactive gas, poses significant health risks, including lung cancer, and is prevalent in indoor environments. Understanding radon testing behavior and Environmental Health Literacy (EHL) is crucial for individuals to take appropriate preventive measures. Purpose: This study assessed radon-related EHL among Health Council participants in seven Northeast Tennessee (NETN) counties and examined associations between sociodemographic factors and EHL levels. Understanding radon knowledge and behaviors within this influential group is critical, as they often serve as trusted public health advocates. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from September - November 2023 among Health Council participants across seven counties in NETN, assessing sociodemographic characteristics and radon EHL. Descriptive statistics and linear regression analyses were employed to examine associations between sociodemographic variables and radon EHL scores. Results: A total of 131 Health Council members participated in the study. Of these total participants, the majority of participants were homeowners (60.3%). While 80.2% of participants had heard of radon, only 12% had tested their homes for it. TV commercials were the primary source of radon information. Younger age (p<0.001), renters (p<0.001), and those of Hispanic ethnicity (p=0.033) were associated with decreased EHL scores. Implications: Study's findings reveal disparities in radon knowledge, testing behavior, and EHL among Health Council participants in NETN. Tailored risk communication strategies considering demographic factors are essential to bridge the radon EHL gap. Collaborative efforts between public health agencies, policymakers, and community members are crucial to enhancing radon knowledge and testing uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.