Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40964313›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Discovery and shaping of decision strategies using adversarial stimuli in rats.

Anqi Zhang, Anthony M Zador

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anqi ZhangCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor NY.ORCID 0000-0002-2626-8086
Anthony M ZadorCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor NY.ORCID 0000-0002-8431-9136

Funding

Circuit mechanisms of auditory categorizationR01DC012565 · NIDCD · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI ZADOR, ANTHONY M · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals typically learn to solve decision tasks in the laboratory through trial and error, rather than through explicit instruction of decision rules. The decision rule used by the animal may be difficult to read out directly from choice or accuracy data, when multiple decision rules are possible given the task design. Here, we demonstrate that in rats performing a visual decision task, probe stimuli can be used to gain information about decision strategy, and in our task revealed variation in the decision strategies used across rats. Further, we find that in a more general version of this task, rats use varying decision strategies that differ from the optimal ideal observer strategy, but respond to manipulations of the stimulus distribution by adjusting their behavioral strategy. Therefore, we show that informative probe stimuli can be used in both training and testing to confirm and shape behavioral strategy in a perceptual decision task.

Identifiers

PMID40964313
PMCPMC12439966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.