Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40964238›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2025

Barriers and Facilitators to the Recruitment and Engagement of Diverse Populations Into Patient and Family Advisory Councils: A Scoping Review.

Madison P Leia, Kaitlin See, Colleen Cuthbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Madison P LeiaUniversity of Calgary, Department of Nursing, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7541-5564
Kaitlin SeeUniversity of Calgary, Department of Nursing, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0438-1118
Colleen CuthbertUniversity of Calgary, Department of Nursing; Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0940-2802

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient and family advisory councils (PFACs) serve as structured collaborative groups where patients and caregivers partner with healthcare professionals to shape policies, service delivery, and research. Despite guidelines emphasizing the need for diverse representation, PFACs often remain socio-demographically homogenous, excluding vulnerable populations from critical discussions that shape healthcare outcomes. This scoping review examines barriers and facilitators influencing the recruitment and engagement of diverse populations in PFACs. A systematic search identified studies focusing on recruitment and engagement barriers and facilitators targeting under-represented groups. Forty-three studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the review. Findings reveal that while race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and age are commonly considered diversity factors, other key populations such as individuals with disabilities, migrants, and those with lived experiences of homelessness, are often overlooked. Facilitators that can improve reach to these vulnerable populations include culturally tailored outreach, relationship-building with community leaders, and reducing logistical barriers. This review provides actionable recommendations for improving diversity in PFACs, ensuring equitable patient engagement that reflects the full spectrum of healthcare experiences.

Indexed as

community engagementdiversityequityinclusionpatient and family advisory councilpatient engagementshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID40964238
PMCPMC12437180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.