ArticleSleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2025
Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on the Degree of Sleepiness, Functional Quality of Sleep, and Electrophysiological Hearing Responses in Individuals with Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
Article in Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment on Hearing and Inner Ear Function in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea-Original Research.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) affects nerve impulse transmission in the auditory pathway due to oxygen supply. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy improves oxygen levels, potentially alleviating sleepiness and enhancing central auditory pathway function. Objective: To longitudinally evaluate the effect of CPAP on the degree of sleepiness, functional quality of sleep, and electrophysiological hearing responses of the central auditory pathways of patients with moderate to severe OSA. Materials and Methods: There were 31 adults (21 men and 10 women), aged 20 to 70 years, of which 18 were from the group with and 13 from the one without CPAP. All patients underwent three assessments: the first one performed immediately after CPAP prescription; the second, 3 months later; and the third, 6 months after the initial assessment. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire-10 (FOSQ-10), auditory brainstem response (ABR), and long-latency auditory evoked potentials (LLAEP) were used for these assessments. Results: The ESS did not detect any changes in excessive daytime sleepiness levels and the FOSQ-10 showed no improvement in either group. Analysis from ABR revealed a high proportion of altered results in both groups at the three assessment times. During the LLAEP, it was observed that the CPAP group exhibited reduced P2 latencies compared with the non-CPAP group in the second assessment. However, this improvement was not sustained in the subsequent assessment, possibly attributed to OSA-induced damage. Conclusion: Treatment with CPAP for 6 months did not improve the degree of sleepiness, functional quality of sleep, or electrophysiological response of hearing, demonstrating that OSA can irreversibly harm the individual.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.