ArticleSleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2025
Comparative Study on CPAP Compliance: PAP-NAP Followed by CPAP Trial vs. CPAP Trial Alone.
Article in Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A multilevel CPAP support strategy implemented within a large stroke clinical trial (sleep SMART).Frontiers in sleep · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of allocating positive airway pressure nap (PAP-NAP) prior to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) trial compared with CPAP trial alone in improving CPAP therapy adherence among individuals diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in our Southeast Asian cohort. Materials and Methods: A total of 133 adults with OSA were divided into 2 groups: 1 received PAP-NAP before a CPAP trial, and the other underwent a CPAP trial alone. The correlation between CPAP adherence and polysomnographic data was investigated. Results: The PAP-NAP group showed better CPAP compliance (above 90%) and adherence (66.64% ± 31.96%) compared with the CPAP-only group (57.90% ± 34.86%). Both groups experienced reductions in apnea hypopnea index (AHI), with the PAP-NAP group having lower residual AHI. Compliance was defined as usage of CPAP > 4H in 14 days. Conclusion: Positive airway pressure naps prior to a CPAP trial increases short-term CPAP adherence and influences mask selection. Personalized CPAP approaches like PAP-NAP can enhance patient acceptance and motivation. Further research is recommended to investigate long-term adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.