ArticleJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2025
Influencing factors of psychological insulin resistance among patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Independent Associations of Diabetes Stigma and Perceived Social Support with Depression and Anxiety Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetes, particularly type 2 diabetes, is a significant global health issue, with insulin therapy being crucial for glycemic control. Psychological insulin resistance (PIR) often hinders effective treatment, impacting treatment outcomes and patient quality of life. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively analyze the influencing factors of PIR among patients with type 2 diabetes, providing insights for developing targeted interventions to enhance insulin therapy acceptance and improve diabetes management. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic search across multiple databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane library, CINAHL, Embase, APA PsycInfo, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), and Sinomed, from inception to July 2025. Studies were included if they focused on type 2 diabetes patients and PIR, with exclusion of non-original research and republished literature. Quality assessment was performed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort and case-control studies, and AHRQ standards for cross-sectional studies. Results: A total of 22 studies involving 5,965 patients were included. The prevalence of PIR ranged from 27.1 to 82.9%. Meta-analysis indicated that female gender (OR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.20-0.72, Conclusions: Understanding the multifaceted nature of PIR is essential for improving glycemic control and patient outcomes. This review provides valuable insights for healthcare providers and researchers, guiding the development of tailored interventions to address PIR and enhance diabetes management. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-025-01714-5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.