ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2025
The current state of ultrasound training in pulmonary residency programmes in the Netherlands: an educational review.
Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress in lung ultrasound education: An updated systematic review.The ultrasound journal · 2026Article
- Highlights from the Italian National Congress of Imaging in Pulmonology 2025: fostering implementation of advanced technologies for precision patient-centered care.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- ERS Congress 2025: highlights from the Clinical Techniques, Imaging and Endoscopy Assembly.ERJ open research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thoracic ultrasound (TUS) is becoming a key diagnostic tool in pulmonary medicine. However, use of this tool may vary between older pulmonologists with less TUS experience and younger generations, including residents, who see the need for TUS training. This review explores nationwide differences in ultrasound training and seeks to improve education quality. We surveyed all Dutch pulmonary medicine programme directors and residents with four sections: baseline questions, applicability, skills and attitude, and future perspectives. Between March and June 2024, we distributed the questionnaire to 193 residents and 26 programme directors. 72 residents (37%) and 19 programme directors (78%) responded. While ultrasound was widely available (95%), the integration with electronic health records remained limited (53%). The majority of respondents considered TUS an essential skill: 92% of the residents and 78% of programme directors (p=0.279). However, several barriers hindered effective training, including a lack of supervisors (reported by 67% of residents), supervisor time constraints (35%), limited access to ultrasound equipment (28%) and resident time constraints (28%). Pulmonary education must move beyond the mentor-apprentice model for ultrasound training, due to a lack of experienced mentors. This review highlights the need for a structured, standardised TUS training programme with proper infrastructure, supervision and hands-on practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.