Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40964180›Full record

ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2025

The current state of ultrasound training in pulmonary residency programmes in the Netherlands: an educational review.

Wytze S de Boer, Carlijn Veldman, Krista L Parlevliet, Wouter H van Geffen, Mireille A Edens, Jos A Stigt, Dirk Jan Slebos, Marieke L Duiverman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wytze S de BoerDepartment of Pulmonology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4890-6640
Carlijn VeldmanDepartment of Pulmonology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Krista L ParlevlietDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Wouter H van GeffenDepartment of Pulmonology, Frisius MC, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Mireille A EdensEpidemiology Unit, Department of Innovation and Science, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5449-5035
Jos A StigtDepartment of Pulmonology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Dirk Jan SlebosDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9555-3422
Marieke L DuivermanDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8818-9447

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thoracic ultrasound (TUS) is becoming a key diagnostic tool in pulmonary medicine. However, use of this tool may vary between older pulmonologists with less TUS experience and younger generations, including residents, who see the need for TUS training. This review explores nationwide differences in ultrasound training and seeks to improve education quality. We surveyed all Dutch pulmonary medicine programme directors and residents with four sections: baseline questions, applicability, skills and attitude, and future perspectives. Between March and June 2024, we distributed the questionnaire to 193 residents and 26 programme directors. 72 residents (37%) and 19 programme directors (78%) responded. While ultrasound was widely available (95%), the integration with electronic health records remained limited (53%). The majority of respondents considered TUS an essential skill: 92% of the residents and 78% of programme directors (p=0.279). However, several barriers hindered effective training, including a lack of supervisors (reported by 67% of residents), supervisor time constraints (35%), limited access to ultrasound equipment (28%) and resident time constraints (28%). Pulmonary education must move beyond the mentor-apprentice model for ultrasound training, due to a lack of experienced mentors. This review highlights the need for a structured, standardised TUS training programme with proper infrastructure, supervision and hands-on practice.

Identifiers

PMID40964180
PMCPMC12439305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.