ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
A drop-out mechanism for active learning based on one-attribute heuristics.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Active Learning (AL) leverages the principle that machine learning models can achieve high accuracy with fewer labeled samples by strategically selecting the most informative data points for training. However, when human annotators provide these labels, their decisions might exhibit a systematic bias. For example, humans frequently rely on a limited subset of the available attributes, or even on a single attribute, when making decisions, as when employing fast and frugal heuristics. This paper introduces a mathematically grounded approach to quantify the probability of mislabeling based on one attribute. We present a novel dropout mechanism designed to influence the attribute selection process used in annotation, effectively reducing the impact of bias. The proposed mechanism is evaluated using multiple AL algorithms and heuristic strategies across diverse prediction tasks. Experimental results demonstrate that the dropout mechanism significantly enhances active learning (AL) performance, achieving a minimum 70% improvement in effectiveness. These findings highlight the mechanism's potential to improve the reliability and accuracy of AL systems, providing valuable insights for designing and implementing robust intelligent systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.