Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40964076›Full record

ArticleArXiv2025

Automated Tuning for Diffusion Inverse Problem Solvers without Generative Prior Retraining.

Yaşar Utku Alçalar, Junno Yun, Mehmet Akçakaya

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yaşar Utku AlçalarDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, MN, USA.
Junno YunDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, MN, USA.
Mehmet AkçakayaDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, MN, USA.

Funding

TRD4 - Ultrahigh Field Engineering and SafetyP41EB027061 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Gregory John Metzger, KAMIL UGURBIL · 2019 to 2026
$11.7M
Rapid Comprehensive Cardiac MRI Exam for Diagnosis of Coronary Artery DiseaseR01HL153146 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI AKCAKAYA, MEHMET · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
Robust and Efficient Learning of High-Resolution Brain MRI Reconstruction from Small Referenceless DataR01EB032830 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Mehmet Akcakaya · 2023 to 2026
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL153146NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027061NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB032830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion/score-based models have recently emerged as powerful generative priors for solving inverse problems, including accelerated MRI reconstruction. While their flexibility allows decoupling the measurement model from the learned prior, their performance heavily depends on carefully tuned data fidelity weights, especially under fast sampling schedules with few denoising steps. Existing approaches often rely on heuristics or fixed weights, which fail to generalize across varying measurement conditions and irregular timestep schedules. In this work, we propose Zero-shot Adaptive Diffusion Sampling (ZADS), a test-time optimization method that adaptively tunes fidelity weights across arbitrary noise schedules without requiring retraining of the diffusion prior. ZADS treats the denoising process as a fixed unrolled sampler and optimizes fidelity weights in a self-supervised manner using only undersampled measurements. Experiments on the fastMRI knee dataset demonstrate that ZADS consistently outperforms both traditional compressed sensing and recent diffusion-based methods, showcasing its ability to deliver high-fidelity reconstructions across varying noise schedules and acquisition settings.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligencecomputational imagingdiffusion modelsMRIzero-shot learning

Identifiers

PMID40964076
PMCPMC12440065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.