Trial reportNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2025
Efficacy and Safety of Cerebroprotein Hydrolysate I Combined with Rehabilitation Training in the Treatment of Provisional Intellectual Developmental Disorder in Children.
Trial report in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: As there are currently limited pharmacologic interventions for provisional intellectual development disorder (PIDD), with treatment mainly relying on rehabilitation training and education, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cerebroprotein hydrolysate I (CH-I) in children with PIDD. Patients and Methods: We conducted a prospective study of 102 children under three years of age who were diagnosed with PIDD in a hospital setting. The control group received standardised rehabilitation training comprising physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy and cognitive development training. In addition to this, the treatment group received a 14-day course of continuous intravenous CH-I infusions, followed by 76 days of oral administration of its derivatives. Neurological function was assessed using the Gesell developmental scales, and brain changes were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Adverse reactions were closely monitored throughout the study. Changes in various indicators were compared between the two groups at baseline and at 14, 30, 60 and 90 days after treatment. Results: At 90 days of treatment, the treatment group showed greater improvement than the control group in fine motor and adaptive functioning compared to their respective baseline periods, and the difference was statistically significant ( Conclusion: CH-I may help to improve fine motor skills and adaptability in children under three years of age with PIDD, improve rehabilitation efficiency, and have good clinical safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.