ArticleResearch square2025
The Futility of Nugent Scoring as a Diagnostic Tool for Neovaginal Bacterial Dysbiosis in Transfeminine People.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Transfeminine people were assigned male at birth and experience a female or feminine gender identity. Many elect to undergo vaginoplasty, a surgical procedure that constructs a neovagina, typically using penile and scrotal tissue. Like cisgender females, transfeminine people experience gynecological symptoms, including pain, discharge, and malodor. In cisgender females, clinicians attribute these symptoms to bacterial dysbiosis and can be diagnosed by Nugent scoring of gram-stained vaginal smears. The Nugent score assesses the abundance of large gram-positive rod vs. small or curved gram-variable rod morphotypes, traditionally for the detection of Objective: This study assessed the Nugent score's utility as a clinical tool for diagnosing neovaginal dysbiosis in transfeminine people who underwent penile inversion vaginoplasty. Study Design: As a part of the TransBiota study, n=39 transfeminine participants self-collected neovaginal smears. Smears were Gram stained and Nugent scored, and Nugent scores were correlated with existing data on neovaginal bacterial composition (16S rRNA gene sequencing), neovaginal cytokines (Luminex multiplex immunoassay), and self-reported symptoms. Results: More than 70% of smears fell in the 7-10 range that would indicate Bacterial Vaginosis in cisgender women. However, Nugent score failed to correlate with the abundance of Nugent-targeted bacteria. Bacteria with similar morphotypes, but not belonging to Conclusion: The Nugent score is not an effective tool to identify neovaginal dysbiosis or indicators of health in transfeminine individuals. Clinicians need the development of accurate, evidence-based diagnostic tools for the neovagina.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.