Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40964029›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Primary Care Provider Perspectives on Expanded Genomic Screening in Children.

Elizabeth Kathleen Branch, Megan C Roberts, Margaret Waltz, Neal A deJong, Laura V Milko, Ann Katherine M Foreman, Kimberly Foss, Stefanija Giric, Marcella H Boynton, Jonathan S Berg and 1 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elizabeth Kathleen BranchUNC School of Medicine Chapel Hill.
Megan C RobertsUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy.
Margaret WaltzUNC School of Medicine Chapel Hill.
Neal A deJongUNC School of Medicine Chapel Hill.
Laura V MilkoUNC School of Medicine Chapel Hill.
Ann Katherine M ForemanUNC School of Medicine Chapel Hill.
Kimberly FossUNC School of Medicine Chapel Hill.
Stefanija GiricUNC School of Medicine Chapel Hill.
Marcella H BoyntonUNC North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences (NC TraCS) Institute.
Jonathan S BergUNC School of Medicine Chapel Hill.
Samantha SchillingUNC School of Medicine Chapel Hill.

Funding

Diversity Supplement: Age-based genomic screening in newborns, infants, and children: a novel paradigm in public health genomicsR01HG012271 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JONATHAN S BERG, Laura Vogel Milko · 2022 to 2026
$4.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG012271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Expanding pediatric genomic screening beyond current newborn screening presents both opportunities and challenges to primary care providers. We are developing a novel paradigm called Age-Based Genomic Screening (ABGS), which will incorporate targeted genomic sequencing for select, highly actionable genetic conditions into routine care at relevant time-points throughout childhood. We surveyed pediatric primary care providers in North Carolina to identify potential ABGS implementation determinants and strategies to address them. Study design: We disseminated an electronic survey to family medicine and pediatric primary care clinicians. Survey items were modeled on constructs previously identified as important to genomic medicine and assessed perceived utility, benefits, barriers, and facilitators of implementing targeted genomic screening in pediatric primary care. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis, as appropriate. Results: A total of 93 individuals completed the survey. Over 85% of respondents agreed that genomic screening was important and impactful in their patient care but about 30% lacked confidence in their ability to implement it in their practice. The most cited benefits of the ABGS program were related to readiness for implementation and the evidence, strength, and quality of the intervention. The most concerning barriers included cost for patients and available resources, with 87% and 75% of respondents having extreme or moderate concern for these barriers, respectively. Conclusions: Our findings have implications both for the design of the ABGS pilot program and directions for future research in genomic implementation. In particular, the blueprint for the pilot program must include specific plans for ensuring primary care providers have the time and resources available for shared decision making with their patients about engaging in genomic screening.

Identifiers

PMID40964029
PMCPMC12440101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.