ArticleResearch square2025
"Now I have to act on that": Parent anticipation of a therapeutic odyssey following predictive testing for autism.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Brain-based tools are being developed to identify infants at ultra-high likelihood for developing autism and enable presymptomatic intervention, though such interventions are not yet clinically available. Given persistent challenges in accessing autism services, we sought to understand how families might use early predictive results to seek support. Methods: We analyzed 55 interviews with parents of infants aged 6-13 months; one group had experience parenting an older autistic child (n = 30), the other had no prior autism parenting experience (n = 25). All parents were asked what steps they would take if told their infant was likely to develop autism. Results: Both groups described an intent to find appropriate services; parents with prior autism experience provided more specifics based on prior knowledge. The groups diverged in their anticipated supports and information sources. Parents with autism experience anticipated seeking financial support via insurance and disability benefits; those without autism experience reported they would consult their pediatrician for information or search online. Limitations: This qualitative study was conducted with a sample of parents selected for their specific life experiences, but likely does not capture the full range of potential responses to biomarker testing in infancy. Conclusions: Given that most services and benefits require a formal diagnosis, families receiving predictive results in infancy will likely face challenges finding appropriate services. Prior to implementing predictive testing in the first year of life, researchers should consider their obligation to support families who receive predictive results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.