Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40964014›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Patient Perspectives on Enhancing Clinician Communication About Pain in Sickle Cell Disease.

Miranda Ravicz Adelmann, Michelle S Diop, Sharl S Azar, Dima Hendricks, Piper K Tingleaf, Miriam A Osei, Stephanie B Kiser, Ana-Maria Vranceanu, Areej El-Jawahri, Christine S Ritchie

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Miranda Ravicz AdelmannMassachusetts General Hospital.
Michelle S DiopMassachusetts General Hospital.
Sharl S AzarMassachusetts General Hospital.
Dima HendricksUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center.
Piper K TingleafUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center.
Miriam A OseiDana-Farber Cancer Institute.
Stephanie B KiserMassachusetts General Hospital.
Ana-Maria VranceanuMassachusetts General Hospital.
Areej El-JawahriMassachusetts General Hospital.
Christine S RitchieMassachusetts General Hospital.

Funding

Bridging the Science-to-Service Gap in Aging Care: Prevention, Optimization and Living Well with Persistent or Serious IllnessesT32AG081327 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Christine S Ritchie, Ana-Maria Vranceanu · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG081327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pain in sickle cell disease (SCD) causes profound emotional and psychological consequences. Poor communication between clinicians and people with SCD can worsen the acute pain experience, yet strategies to improve these interactions remain unclear. We aimed to understand how people with SCD communicate with clinicians about pain and how patient-clinician communication could be improved. Methods: We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with people with SCD aged 16 and older (n = 30). We used rapid qualitative analysis to provide early insights into intervention development. Results: Five themes emerged: 1) people with SCD want clinicians to believe their pain experiences, to show they care, and to demonstrate knowledge about SCD; 2) SCD-related pain directly impacts the ability to communicate; 3) communication about SCD pain should be tailored in content and pace based on the pain severity; 4) prior experiences influence how people with SCD communicate about pain; and 5) healthcare system and institutional factors can positively influence patient-clinician communication in SCD. Discussion: Empathic communication can have significant impact on the pain experience of people with SCD. Training clinicians in SCD-specific empathic communication skills may improve pain care for this population.

Identifiers

PMID40964014
PMCPMC12440092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.