Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40963946›Full record

ArticleBrain & NeuroRehabilitation2025

Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Upper and Lower Limb Motor Function and Spasticity After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.

Hoo Young Lee, Byungju Ryu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & NeuroRehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and mirror therapy for upper limb rehabilitation in stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hoo Young LeeDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3846-943X
Byungju RyuDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Loving Care Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0109-9885

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive neuromodulation technique, has emerged as a potential adjunct to conventional rehabilitation though findings remain inconsistent. This study investigated the efficacy of rTMS combined with conventional rehabilitation in improving motor function and spasticity after stroke through a systematic review and meta-analysis. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched through February 2022. Sixty-eight randomized controlled trials were included based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Cochrane tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. rTMS significantly improved upper limb motor outcomes including Fugl-Meyer assessment scores (mean difference [MD], 3.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 4.92; p = 0.002), hand function (standardized MD, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.52; p = 0.02), and grip strength (MD, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.20 to 6.03; p = 0.003), with low-certainty evidence. It also significantly reduced upper limb spasticity (MD, -0.48; 95% CI, -0.64 to -0.33; p < 0.00001), with low-certainty evidence. No significant effects were observed for lower limb motor outcomes, and evidence for lower limb spasticity was insufficient. These findings suggest that rTMS may be considered as an adjunct to to enhance upper limb motor function and reduce spasticity in stroke rehabilitation. However, its use for lower limb recovery should be individualized based on neurological status. Further studies are needed to establish optimal protocols and long-term effects.

Indexed as

Motor ActivityMuscle SpasticityRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStrokeTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40963946
PMCPMC12438566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.