ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Groin Flap Reconstruction for Finger Defects: A Case Series and Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The groin flap, a reliable pedicled flap first described by McGregor and Jackson, remains a valuable reconstructive option for digital soft tissue defects, especially in settings lacking microsurgical resources. Despite its widespread use, few studies have comprehensively assessed risk factors associated with flap failure and postoperative complications. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted on 46 patients who underwent groin flap reconstruction for finger defects between 2015 and 2024. Patients were grouped according to flap success and the occurrence of postoperative complications. Demographic, clinical, and operative variables were compared using appropriate statistical tests. Results: Flap success was achieved in 93.5% (n = 43) of cases. Flap failure (n = 3) was associated with higher body mass index (BMI) (29.1 versus 24.5), smaller flap width (3.3 versus 5.5 cm, Conclusions: Groin flaps offer high success rates for finger reconstruction; however, increased BMI, smoking, and venous congestion are significant risk factors for postoperative complications. These findings underscore the importance of patient optimization and vigilant postoperative monitoring to improve surgical outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.