ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Applications of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Upper Eyelid Anatomy and Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty: A Systematic Review.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current upper eyelid blepharoplasty techniques vary widely, and many revision patients lack information of the initial procedure, making reparability assessment and surgical planning challenging. In such complex procedures, perioperative analysis of eyelid anatomy is crucial. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is valuable for studying upper eyelid anatomy and function, significant variations exist in MRI protocols, research methods, and objectives across studies. This systematic review aimed to explore MRI applications in upper eyelid anatomy and blepharoplasty and summarize factors limiting its clinical use. Methods: A systematic review of clinical studies utilizing MRI for upper eyelid anatomy and blepharoplasty was conducted by searching PubMed and Web of Science until January 5, 2025. Publications were categorized by research objectives. The study types, populations, observational tools, MRI protocols, outcomes, and conclusions were summarized. Results: Of the 12 articles reviewed, 7 detailed normal anatomy and functions, 2 identified racial anatomical disparities, 1 assessed tumor extent, and 2 highlighted anatomical changes postblepharoplasty. Dynamic MRI had proven effective for functional eyelid analysis, whereas surface microscopy coils improved spatial resolution. Limitations included protocol inconsistencies, small samples, artifacts, and cost. Conclusions: Dynamic high-resolution MRI excels in evaluating upper eyelid anatomy through superior soft-tissue contrast and quantitative analysis. It supports personalized surgical planning and objective postoperative assessments in revision and complex cases. By visualizing structural changes, it optimizes upper blepharoplasty techniques. Standardized protocols and larger cohort studies are needed to advance clinical adoption.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.