ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Real-world efficacy and safety of inetetamab-based therapy in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients with prior exposure to trastuzumab.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world outcomes and safety of inetetamab plus pyrotinib and chemotherapy in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
- Real-World Outcomes With Inetetamab-Based Regimens for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis in China.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Until now there has been no comprehensive data from extensive samples to evaluate the therapeutic potential of inetetamab in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who had a history of trastuzumab treatment. Some previous studies had either small sample sizes from single-center, or partial enrolled patients without prior exposure to trastuzumab. This study aimed to provide a deep analysis of inetetamab-based therapy in this specific population. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study collected clinicopathological data from a total of 500 patients between Jul 2020 and Oct 2023. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events (AEs). The association of risk factors with the effect of inetetamab treatment on PFS was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: In the overall cohort, we observed a median PFS of 8.0 months, an ORR of 28.6% and a DCR of 89.2% (median treatment line: third line). Meanwhile, patients who received a combination treatment regime of inetetamab + tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) + chemotherapy achieved the most prolonged PFS of 9.0 months and the higher ORR of 29.3%. Ki67 index, distant lymph nodes metastasis and treatment strategy were independent predictors of PFS. The most common all-grade AEs were neutropenia (182/500, 36.4%) and leukopenia (157/500, 31.4%). Conclusions: Inetetamab was promising in HER2-positive MBC patients who had prior exposure to trastuzumab, offering a new option for patients with a prior failure of trastuzumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.