ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Construction of a glycosylation-related prognostic signature for predicting prognosis, tumor microenvironment, and immune response in soft tissue sarcoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Altered glycosylation, one of the most common post-translational protein modifications, plays a critical role in the initiation and progression of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Dysregulated expression of glycosyltransferases leads to abnormal glycosylation patterns, which may offer valuable insights for prognosis and therapeutic response prediction in STS. Methods: Transcriptional variants and expression profiles of glycosylation-related genes were analyzed using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Differential gene expression analysis and non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) were performed to identify STS molecular subtypes. A comprehensive machine learning framework integrating 101 algorithms was applied to construct a glycosyltransferase-based prognostic signature. Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the prognostic value of the model. Immune infiltration was evaluated using multiple computational approaches, and functional validation was conducted via Results: Two distinct STS subtypes with significant immunological and clinical differences were identified. A 12-gene glycosyltransferase signature was developed, effectively stratifying patients into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the median riskscore. The high-risk group demonstrated significantly poorer survival outcomes. Immune profiling revealed greater immunosuppression in the high-risk group. Conclusions: The proposed glycosylation-related gene signature accurately distinguishes between high- and low-risk STS patients and may serve as a reliable prognostic tool. It also provides novel insights into tumor immune microenvironment and potential therapeutic targets for STS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.