Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40963679›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Mirabegron for intramural ureteral stones with vesical irritability: a prospective study.

Mengjun Dai, Yuhang She, Hao Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mengjun Dai *1 Department of Anesthesia Operating Room, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing City, Jiangsu, China.
Yuhang She *Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing City, Jiangsu, China.
Hao WangDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing City, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy of mirabegron in patients with intramural ureteral stones (6-10 mm). Methods: We prospectively randomized 92 patients with intramural ureteral stones into two groups. Patients in the mirabegron group received 50 mg of mirabegron daily, while those in the tamsulosin group received 0.4 mg tamsulosin daily. All patients were required to use the Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) to assess the urinary urgency and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to assess pain. Patients were followed until stone expulsion or for up to 4 weeks. Results: All of 80 patients were included in this study. 41 patients in mirabegron group and 39 patients in tamsulosin group as control. The average expulsion time was shorter in mirabegron group than in tamsulosin group (8.4 ± 2.9 vs. 11.2 ± 3.1 days, Conclusion: Mirabegron not only accelerates the expulsion of intramural ureteral stones but also relieves renal colic and vesical irritability.

Indexed as

adrenergic beta-3 receptor agonistsmirabegronoveractive bladderureteral calculiurinary tract symptoms

Identifiers

PMID40963679
PMCPMC12436088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.