SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Efficacy and safety of nebulized drugs in the treatment of non-severe
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nebulised Chinese herbal medicine for paediatric pneumonia: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- A nursing perspective on bronchoscopic intervention strategies for children with macrolide-unresponsiveFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of commonly used nebulized drugs as adjuvant treatment for non-severe Methods: A computerized search of major Chinese and English literature databases was conducted to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that utilized nebulized drugs in conjunction with azithromycin (AZM) or AZM alone in children with MPP. Following literature screening, the quality of the included studies was evaluated using the risk of bias assessment tool as recommended by the Cochrane Handbook. Outcome data for each measurement were extracted, and a network meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 17.0. Results: A total of 79 RCTs involving 7,712 patients and 9 interventions were included. The network meta-analysis indicated that all nebulized drugs combined with AZM markedly improved clinical efficacy compared to AZM alone. Among these, the combination of nebulized budesonide plus terbutaline demonstrated superior efficacy and safety as adjunctive therapy for non-severe MPP. Furthermore, Ambroxol combined with AZM was particularly effective in shortening the duration of clinical symptoms such as fever and lung rales. The combinations of terbutaline or budesonide with AZM significantly improved pulmonary function. Conclusion: Nebulized drug adjuvants to AZM therapy enhance treatment efficacy in children with non-severe MPP without increasing the incidence of adverse events. However, there is a need for more extensive, higher-quality clinical studies to overcome the limitations due to the low quality of some included articles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.