ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
A deep hybrid learning framework with attention-enhanced feature extraction for BMI prediction based on physical fitness.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating physical fitness and psychology: an in-depth discussion of exercise interventions for weight reduction among university students.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Body Mass Index (BMI) assessment remains a critical challenge in university health monitoring, where traditional methods fail to capture dynamic relationships between physical fitness indicators and body composition. This study develops a novel predictive framework to address this gap through advanced machine learning techniques applied to longitudinal fitness data from Chinese university students. Methods: We analyzed 6,698 male students' fitness records (2018-2022) using a hybrid CNN1D-Attention-LightGBM architecture. The model integrates temporal pattern recognition via sliding windows, multi-kernel convolutional operations for physiological coupling analysis, and dynamic attention weighting. Performance was validated through 10-fold cross-validation against SVM and XGBoost benchmarks. Results: The model achieved 94.5% accuracy (F1 = 0.93), significantly outperforming conventional methods (XGBoost: 90.1%). Cardiorespiratory endurance (3000 m run, r = 0.2009) and upper-body strength (pull-ups, r = -0.2786) emerged as primary BMI determinants. The framework successfully classified four BMI categories (normal weight: 4,991; obese: 82) . Conclusion: This study establishes the first unified solution for fitness-informed BMI prediction, though limited by male-only sampling. Implementation should prioritize integration with campus health systems and expansion to diverse populations. Future work should incorporate psychosocial factors and multi-regional validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.