ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Substantial loss of T cells upon lymphocyte isolation from heparin-anticoagulated peripheral blood.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Analysis of lymphocytes usually involves the usage of blood anticoagulants, with the type of anticoagulant often determined by clinical routines, without testing which anticoagulant is ideal for the research question. We systematically compared the effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and heparin anticoagulation on recovery and composition of peripheral lymphocyte populations. This comprehensive analysis of the effect of heparin and EDTA on recovery of different lymphocyte subsets has, to our knowledge, not been performed previously. On average, the recovery of lymphocytes is lower in heparin-treated samples. This is due to a loss of T cells, as the absolute numbers of T cells is reduced by 38% in heparin-treated samples compared to EDTA-treated samples, whereas there was no significant loss of B cells observed in the heparin-treated samples. Several T cell subsets, such as memory T cell subsets, are significantly affected. We analysed different steps of the lymphocyte isolation protocol to clarify in which step cells are lost. Losses during several isolation steps showed biases in cell composition, and a significant amount of cells may be lost, e.g. during density gradient centrifugation. However, these losses were generally similar in EDTA- and heparin-treated samples, arguing for an additional mechanism of cell loss. In conclusion, isolation of mononuclear cells from peripheral blood with heparin as anticoagulant causes a partial loss of T cells, with particular subsets preferentially affected, so that there is a risk that the composition of the lymphocyte compartment may be inaccurately assessed when using heparin-treated blood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.