ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Experiences with complementary and integrative medicine in mental healthcare: a qualitative substudy of the PSYKIM project.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient Satisfaction with Advanced Medical Technology-Based Treatments in Integrative Medicine: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach Among Patients with Chronic Diseases.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Use of complementary and integrative medicine for mental disorders-a cross-sectional study in Germany.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Complementary and integrative medical procedures (CIM) are commonly used in Germany, including for the treatment of mental health conditions. The aim of the study was to investigate how CIM is used and perceived in outpatient mental healthcare settings. Methods: This qualitative interview study was conducted as part of the PSYKIM cross-sectional project. Twenty participants (15 women, 5 men; mean age 37.5 years, range 19-64) were recruited from a larger survey sample. Semi-structured telephone interviews were used to explore participants' experiences with CIM therapies in the context of mental healthcare. Interview data was analyzed using qualitative content analysis within a constructivist paradigm. Results: The most frequently used CIM therapies were yoga, acupuncture, meditation, art therapy, and progressive muscle relaxation (PMR). Thematic analysis identified four overarching experiential dimensions across therapies: (1) emotional regulation and inner calm, (2) individual prerequisites and ambivalent effects, (3) creative expression and emotional processing, and (4) the influence of therapeutic setting. CIM therapies were experienced in highly heterogeneous ways. While many interviewed participants reported symptom relief, improved wellbeing, and enhanced self-awareness through CIM therapies, others described frustration, emotional distress, or a lack of effect. Overall, experiences were highly individualized and influenced by factors such as personal readiness, the therapeutic environment, and group dynamics. Conclusion: The highly heterogeneous ways in which patients with mental health conditions experience CIM therapies underscore the need for individualized implementation, professional guidance, and open communication about both benefits and potential risks. Future research should investigate how multimodal interventions that combine CIM with conventional treatments can be individually tailored and contextually adapted to improve mental health outcomes. Trial registration: This study has been registered in the German Clinical Trial Registry with trial ID DRKS00032426 on 08.08.2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.