Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40963582›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Multimodal imaging features of high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with pulmonary and nodal metastases: a case report and literature review.

Huayun Tan, Tingting Zhang

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Huayun TanObstetrics Medical Center, Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Tingting ZhangObstetrics Medical Center, Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is an aggressive tumor that poses significant diagnostic challenges, particularly when associated with multifocal metastases. Multimodal imaging, including ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), plays a critical role in diagnosis. Case presentation: A 51-year-old woman presented with abnormal vaginal bleeding and pelvic pain. Ultrasound revealed an 8 × 12 × 17 cm heterogeneous mass located in the uterine body and cervix. CT scans showed metastatic pelvic lymphadenopathy and pulmonary nodules. MRI demonstrated a T2-hyperintense lesion with myometrial and cervical invasion, along with restricted diffusion on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping. Pathological analysis confirmed high-grade ESS. Results: Multimodal imaging successfully differentiated high-grade ESS from benign uterine lesions by identifying aggressive features such as ill-defined margins on ultrasound, areas of necrosis on CT, and restricted diffusion on MRI. The patient was diagnosed with stage IVB (T3bN1M1) high-grade ESS, due to pelvic lymph node involvement and multiple pulmonary metastases. Conclusion: High-grade ESS is prone to distant metastasis. MRI with DWI and ADC mapping is crucial for assessing tumor cellularity and local invasion, while CT is effective for detecting metastases. Future staging protocols should integrate contrast-enhanced MRI and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for comprehensive assessment.

Indexed as

diagnostic imagingdiffusion magnetic resonance imagingendometrial stromal sarcomamultimodal imagingneoplasm metastasis

Identifiers

PMID40963582
PMCPMC12436435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.