ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Defining knowledge gaps in preterm birth research: Can biomarkers fill the gaps?
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Relative risk and excess fraction of preterm birth across maternal occupation and industry: a Danish nationwide register-based cohort study of employed pregnant women.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Preterm birth (PTB) is a syndrome arising from multiple etiologies that manifest as a final common phenotype, delivery before full term. Current knowledge gaps in epidemiologic, basic science, and clinical fields have limited our understanding of this complex pregnancy syndrome. Lack of insight into the cellular and molecular pathways underlying spontaneous PTB (PTB) has thus limited effective clinical management and restricted the investigation of novel treatments or druggable targets. Here, we examine several areas of domain-driven research that may lead to a better understanding of PTB, including infection and inflammation that drive early labor, social factors and their biological consequences that may affect or contribute to PTB risk, and current limitations affecting the development of novel pharmacological treatments. We discuss how the development of new biomarkers or panels of biomarkers can define PTB risk status and disease mechanisms and potentially lead to new therapies by bridging gaps between research domains often used to study PTB in relative isolation. We note that these panels may be population specific and it is critical to assess the heterogeneity of PTB in light of the variation among women of diverse backgrounds, both environmentally and genetically. Finally, we consider how complementary biomarkers from different PTB research domains could be integrated to design new diagnostic, preventative, and management options. Our hope is that new ways of looking at PTB can improve understanding of this common pregnancy complication leading to reduced global rates of PTB and improved outcomes for affected infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.