SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Timing of antibiotic initiation in sepsis and neutropenic fever.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenia in haematological patients: current considerations and future challenges.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026Review
- Hemodynamic Effect of IgM-Enriched Immunoglobulin in the Early Stage ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A multidimensional nomogram for clinical risk stratification of bloodstream infection and mortality in hematologic malignancies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sepsis, as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide. The condition requires rapid treatment, and Methods: We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature regarding timing of antimicrobial administration and its impact on sepsis outcome, to evaluate whether a 1 h target for initiating antibiotics is a reasonable goal. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed database, and we performed a narrative synthesis of the studies. Results: Of the 42 studies reviewed, 34 demonstrated a significant association between delayed time to first antibiotic and increased mortality rates. The majority of the studies found a significant increase in mortality with delays in antimicrobial initiation, particularly with hourly cutoffs. Discussion: Sepsis is a heterogeneous condition, complicating the establishment of universal guidelines. Approximately half of the studies identified a near-linear relationship between delayed antimicrobial treatment and increased mortality, emphasizing the benefit of administering antibiotics within 1 h. However, other studies did not observe this linear association, instead reporting significantly increased mortality only after 3-6 h. These findings may indicate that a 1 h goal may not be optimal for all patients. Conclusion: Based on the findings in this systematic review, the recommendations outlined in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.