ReviewThe New phytologist2026
Harnessing the benefits of herbarium specimen digitisation for inferring recent and ongoing plant extinctions.
Review in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence for the ongoing biodiversity crisis rests on assessment of a small fraction of described species, with major knowledge gaps for most organisms, including plants. Here, we highlight how digitised herbarium specimens can be used to accelerate and improve estimates of recent and ongoing plant extinctions. We focus on species already considered extinct because they represent a special category for understanding biodiversity loss and a special scientific challenge, as their 'detection' relies on proving absence. We propose that this challenge is embodied by a neglected biodiversity shortfall, the Katuš shortfall, encompassing all facets of unquantified levels of past, present and future biodiversity loss. To address this shortfall, we review how methods for estimating the probability of species extinction can be scaled up to harness the massive amounts of digitised data being produced across the 'global metaherbarium' using artificial intelligence. Thus, we suggest that the Katuš shortfall can be diminished by shifting focus from proving absence to a probabilistic framework. This can contribute to increasing the accuracy of lists of extinct plants and reveal the true extent of the biodiversity crisis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.