Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40963351›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

Safeguarding sustenance: Singapore's strategic commitment to enhancing food security through advancing food research and innovation.

Aaron Zongwei Li, Ying Tong Yeo, Wei Ning Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Food systems transformation: rationale and methodologies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aaron Zongwei LiSchool of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Ying Tong YeoSchool of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8869-0151
Wei Ning ChenSchool of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-1111-5076

Funding

Future Ready Food Safety Hub (FRESH)Nanyang Technological University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The article examines Singapore's proactive approach to addressing its food security challenges amid limited natural resources and external pressures such as climate change and global market volatility. In light of the '30 by 30' goal, which aspires to produce 30% of the nation's nutritional needs in Singapore by 2030, the article outlines Singapore's drive for innovation through a comprehensive framework based on technological innovation, regulatory agility and collaborative partnerships that underpin Singapore's food security strategy. Key factors for success include strategic leadership, robust investments in research and development, the nurturing of a skilled workforce and a focus on sustainable practices and market acceptance. Lessons and parallels with global leaders in different sectors of food innovation are also explored. By positioning itself as a hub for cutting-edge food technologies and sustainable practices, Singapore aims to set a benchmark for resilience in food systems that can serve as a model for other nations confronting similar issues.This article is part of the theme issue 'Transforming terrestrial food systems for human and planetary health'.

Indexed as

Food SecurityFood SupplyHumansSingaporealternative foodsfood securitytechnology innovation

Identifiers

PMID40963351
PMCPMC12444370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.