Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40963349›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

Towards a collaborative interdisciplinary systems approach to urban food system transformation: a case study from the Mandala research consortium.

Alexia Sawyer, Kelly Parsons, Jean Adams, Soujanya Mantravadi, Steven Cummins, Martin White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Key action areas for transforming the UK food system: insights from the Transforming UK Food Systems (TUKFS) Programme project portfolio.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Food systems transformation: rationale and methodologies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexia SawyerMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9079-4814
Kelly ParsonsMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6473-210X
Jean AdamsMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5733-7830
Soujanya MantravadiDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9382-8314
Steven CumminsPopulation Health Innovation Lab, Department of Public Health, Environments & Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3957-4357
Martin WhiteMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1861-6757

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the need to transform food systems to improve human and planetary health, the activities and actors of food systems remain largely intransigent to change. The Mandala research consortium offers a case study of how three methodological principles-interdisciplinary science, systems thinking and stakeholder collaboration-can be integrated to identify interventions with transformative potential in an urban food system. An existing conceptual framework was employed to interrogate the case study and reflect on the challenges and opportunities of its methods across two phases: (i) understanding the food system and identifying places to intervene; (ii) envisioning and prioritizing food system interventions. Ambitions to work across the breadth of the urban food system were supported by interdisciplinary science and stakeholder collaboration; tailoring the research process accommodated the epistemic, social, symbolic, spatial and temporal differences between stakeholders. A complex adaptive systems approach enabled identification of promising food system interventions. Nevertheless, challenges arose in every aspect of the work. A collaborative interdisciplinary systems approach to system transformation was articulated using a real-world example. While opportunities support the funding and design of research using a similar methodological approach, the documented challenges of adopting this approach may be overcome with practical solutions.This article is part of the theme issue 'Transforming terrestrial food systems for human and planetary health'.

Indexed as

Food SupplyCitiesCooperative BehaviorHumansInterdisciplinary Researchdietfood systemsinterdisciplinary sciencestakeholder collaborationsystems sciencetransformation

Identifiers

PMID40963349
PMCPMC12444375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.