ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
Towards a collaborative interdisciplinary systems approach to urban food system transformation: a case study from the Mandala research consortium.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Key action areas for transforming the UK food system: insights from the Transforming UK Food Systems (TUKFS) Programme project portfolio.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Towards a collaborative interdisciplinary systems approach to urban food system transformation: a case study from the Mandala research consortium.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Food systems transformation: rationale and methodologies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the need to transform food systems to improve human and planetary health, the activities and actors of food systems remain largely intransigent to change. The Mandala research consortium offers a case study of how three methodological principles-interdisciplinary science, systems thinking and stakeholder collaboration-can be integrated to identify interventions with transformative potential in an urban food system. An existing conceptual framework was employed to interrogate the case study and reflect on the challenges and opportunities of its methods across two phases: (i) understanding the food system and identifying places to intervene; (ii) envisioning and prioritizing food system interventions. Ambitions to work across the breadth of the urban food system were supported by interdisciplinary science and stakeholder collaboration; tailoring the research process accommodated the epistemic, social, symbolic, spatial and temporal differences between stakeholders. A complex adaptive systems approach enabled identification of promising food system interventions. Nevertheless, challenges arose in every aspect of the work. A collaborative interdisciplinary systems approach to system transformation was articulated using a real-world example. While opportunities support the funding and design of research using a similar methodological approach, the documented challenges of adopting this approach may be overcome with practical solutions.This article is part of the theme issue 'Transforming terrestrial food systems for human and planetary health'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.