ArticleArchives of rheumatology2025
Gut Microbiota Mediator Level and Its Relation to Disease Activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis.
Article in Archives of rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aims: It is known that the intestinal microbiota plays an essential role in developing many diseases. In this study, the relationship between gut microbiota markers and clinical parameters of ankylosing spondylitis and the effect of drugs on gut microbiota markers were evaluated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the composition of the gut microbiota in individuals with ankylosing spondylitis by comparing it with that of healthy individuals to assess the potential effects of microbial alterations on disease pathogenesis and inflammatory response and to identify differences based on treatment methods. Materials and Methods: This study included 76 AS patients diagnosed for at least 2 years, aged between 18 and 65 (38 anti-TNF recipients and 38 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug [NSAID] recipients), and 38 ageand sex-matched healthy volunteers. Detailed clinical evaluations were conducted on patients and volunteers. All patients underwent a systematic clinical evaluation in accordance with the diagnostic and follow-up criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. In this context, the modified Schober test was performed to assess the lumbar flexion range of motion, chest expansion was measured with a tape measure, and cervical and thoracolumbar spinal range of motion was evaluated using a goniometer. Additionally, a detailed peripheral joint examination, including all major and minor joints, was conducted to identify peripheral joint involvement. Relevant areas were also assessed for the presence of enthesitis in terms of tenderness and pain. Sacroiliac joint tenderness was examined through direct palpation and provocation tests. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured in patients and volunteers, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) scores were also calculated and recorded in the patient group. CD14, CTLA4, CXC16, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and TLR4 levels were measured in serum samples using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. Results: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index and BASFI scores were significantly higher in the NSAI (Non-Steroidal Anti Inflammatory) recipient group than in the anti-TNF recipient group (P < .05). C-reactive protein and ESR levels were significantly lower in patients who received anti-TNF therapy than those who received NSAI therapy (P < .05). CTLA4, CXC16, LPS, and TLR4 levels were found to be significantly higher in patients receiving NSAI treatment compared to those receiving anti-TNF treatment and the healthy controls (P < .05). There were no significant differences between patients and controls concerning CD14 levels (P > .05). Conclusion: This research observed that CRP and ESR levels and disease activity scores in AS patients who received anti-TNF treatment were lower than those in the NSAID treatment group and even closer to the control group. It was believed that the connection between microbiota markers and clinical and inflammatory markers can indicate the pathogenesis of AS, guide treatment follow-up, and help develop new treatment strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.