In one paragraphArticle in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
11 authors.
Maria G FoisMERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Technology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9304-1554 Seppe BormansInstitute for Materials Research, Hasselt University, Wetenschapspark 1, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Thijs VandenrytInstitute for Materials Research, Hasselt University, Wetenschapspark 1, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8140-7221 Alexander P M GuttenplanMERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Technology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Yousra Alaoui SelsouliMERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Technology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Clemens van BlitterswijkMERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Technology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Zeinab Tahmasebi BirganiMERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Technology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3899-922X Stefan GiselbrechtMERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Technology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1354-0167 Pamela HabibovićMERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Technology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8249-5155 Ronald ThoelenInstitute for Materials Research, Hasselt University, Wetenschapspark 1, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6845-0866 Roman K TruckenmüllerMERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Technology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7541-525X Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Cellular spheroids are considered a popular option for modeling healthy and diseased tissues
Indexed as
Cell Culture TechniquesDielectric SpectroscopyMesenchymal Stem CellsSpheroids, CellularBioreactorsCells, CulturedElectric ImpedanceHumansmicrobiomaterialsmicro(fluidic) bioreactorsmicrowell arraysnon-Faradaic electrical impedance spectroscopyreal-time monitoringspheroids
Identifiers
PMID40963269
PMCPMC12522083
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390