ReviewSkeletal muscle2025
The rise of rat models for Duchenne muscular dystrophy and therapeutic evaluations.
Review in Skeletal muscle, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Duchenne muscular dystrophy: from gene to gene-ius therapies.Skeletal muscle · 2026Review
- Systemic regeneration medicines for muscular dystrophy: progress and challenges in pro-regenerative drug development.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2026Review
- Functional and structural pathologies in skeletal muscle of a rat model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Skeletal muscle · 2026Article
- Correction: The rise of rat models for Duchenne muscular dystrophy and therapeutic evaluations.Skeletal muscle · 2026Article
- Musculoskeletal ultrasound-guided cellular therapy: Current applications and future directions in skeletal muscle regeneration.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a devastating X-linked neuromuscular disorder characterized by the absence of a functional dystrophin, leading to progressive muscle loss responsible for cardiorespiratory failure and premature death. While mouse, dog, and pig models have long supported DMD preclinical research, each has limitations in terms of phenotype severity, translational relevance, cost, or ethical acceptance. The emergence of genetically engineered DMD rat models marks a major advancement, offering an intermediate platform that combines practical handling, robust disease features, and disease trajectory accuracy with human patients. Rat models exhibit early, progressive and severe skeletal and cardiac pathology, including impaired muscle regeneration due to satellite cell senescence, all of which closely mirrors patient pathology. In vivo single-nucleus transcriptomics has further highlighted the complexity of fibrotic, inflammatory, and stem cell dysfunction across affected tissues. Importantly, DMD rat models have proven valuable for preclinical therapeutic studies, including gene and exon-skipping therapies, small compounds or cell-based interventions, and senescence-targeting strategies. They have also supported functional, histological, and molecular endpoints aligned with clinical practice. Importantly, DMD rat lines are not phenotypically uniform. Variations in mutation type, involvement of specific dystrophin isoforms, spontaneous exon skipping, and genetic background lead to differences in disease onset, severity, organ involvement, and survival. These distinctions influence the suitability of each model for precision therapeutic strategies. DMD preclinical rat models therefore provide a powerful complementary tool that fits into a continuum of modeling to advance understanding of pathogenic mechanisms, biomarker discovery, and translational research. Their progressive adoption will be accelerating the development of more effective and clinically relevant therapies for patients affected by dystrophin deficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.