ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
Supervised machine learning for classification and prediction of stunting among under-five Egyptian children.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Insights Into Factors Affecting Nurses' Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward AI and Implications for Successful AI Integration in Critical Care: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR nursing · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in child nutrition and eating behavior: from prediction to gastronomic mediation.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Predicting Stunting Beyond Borders: Lessons From an Ethiopian Model and Pathways for Global Application.Health science reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionStunting, a significant form of chronic undernutrition, affects millions of children under five worldwide and poses substantial challenges to physical, cognitive, and socioeconomic development—particularly in low- and middle-income countries like Egypt.
aimsThis study aims to apply and compare the performance of various supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms to classify and predict stunting among Egyptian children under five years old. It also aims to identify key risk factors that contribute to stunting.
methodsData from the Egypt Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) conducted in 2005, 2008, and 2014 were used. After extensive data cleaning and preprocessing—including handling missing values and addressing class imbalance—five ML classifiers (XGBoost, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and K-Nearest Neighbors) were trained and evaluated using 10-fold stratified cross-validation, performance metrics included accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and ROC-AUC.
resultsGradient Boosting and Random Forest achieved the highest predictive performance, with accuracy scores exceeding 90% and ROC-AUC values above 0.96. Logistic Regression also performed robustly, while K-Nearest Neighbors showed relatively lower performance due to sensitivity to noise and high-dimensional data Significant predictors of stunting included the child’s nutritional status, maternal education, birth size, wealth index, and rural residence.
conclusionThe application of supervised machine learning, especially with the Gradient Boosting and Random Forest techniques, showed excellent accuracy in predicting stunting in children under five years of age in Egypt. The results of this study highlight the utility of machine learning in identifying vulnerable groups for targeted public health interventions. Further studies are encouraged to utilize more recent data and focus on multi-level feature selection and hyperparameter optimization to improve prediction precision further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.