ArticleGenome biology2025
A hierarchical, count-based model highlights challenges in scATAC-seq data analysis and points to opportunities to extract finer-resolution information.
Article in Genome biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in single-cell and spatial multi-omics for plant development and stress responses.Plant diversity · 2026Review
- Integrative Epigenomics: Bioinformatics Strategies for Multi-Omics Data Analysis in Health and Disease.Epigenomes · 2026Review
- Single-cell insights into plant growth, adaptation, and evolution.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Review
- CIRCE: a scalable Python package to predict cis-regulatory DNA interactions from single-cell chromatin accessibility data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- simPIC:flexible simulation of paired-insertion counts for single-cell ATAC sequencing data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A hierarchical, count-based model highlights challenges in scATAC-seq data analysis and points to opportunities to extract finer-resolution information.Genome biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundData from Single-cell Assay for Transposase Accessible Chromatin with Sequencing (scATAC-seq) is highly sparse. While current computational methods feature a range of transformation procedures to extract meaningful information, major challenges remain.
resultsHere, we discuss the major scATAC-seq data analysis challenges such as sequencing depth normalization and region-specific biases. We present a hierarchical count model that is motivated by the data generating process of scATAC-seq data. Our simulations show that current scATAC-seq data, while clearly containing physical single-cell resolution, are too sparse to infer true informational-level single-cell, single-region of chromatin accessibility states.
conclusionsWhile the broad utility of scATAC-seq at a cell type level is undeniable, describing it as fully resolving chromatin accessibility at single-cell resolution, particularly at individual locus level, may overstate the level of detail currently achievable. We conclude that chromatin accessibility profiling at true single-cell, single-region resolution is challenging with current data sensitivity, but that it may be achieved with promising developments in optimizing the efficiency of scATAC-seq assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.