Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40963104›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2025

A hierarchical, count-based model highlights challenges in scATAC-seq data analysis and points to opportunities to extract finer-resolution information.

Aaron Wing Cheung Kwok, Heejung Shim, Davis J McCarthy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Single-cell insights into plant growth, adaptation, and evolution.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aaron Wing Cheung KwokBioinformatics and Cellular Genomics, St Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, 3065, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Heejung ShimMelbourne Integrative Genomics, University of Melbourne, 3010, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Davis J McCarthyBioinformatics and Cellular Genomics, St Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, 3065, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia. dmccarthy@svi.edu.au.

Funding

Integrated analysis of multi-omic QTLs at single cell resolutionR01HG011886 · NHGRI · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI BANOVICH, NICHOLAS ELI · 2022 to 2025
$2.9M
National Health and Medical Research Council GNT1195595NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011886NIH HHS R01HG011886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData from Single-cell Assay for Transposase Accessible Chromatin with Sequencing (scATAC-seq) is highly sparse. While current computational methods feature a range of transformation procedures to extract meaningful information, major challenges remain.

resultsHere, we discuss the major scATAC-seq data analysis challenges such as sequencing depth normalization and region-specific biases. We present a hierarchical count model that is motivated by the data generating process of scATAC-seq data. Our simulations show that current scATAC-seq data, while clearly containing physical single-cell resolution, are too sparse to infer true informational-level single-cell, single-region of chromatin accessibility states.

conclusionsWhile the broad utility of scATAC-seq at a cell type level is undeniable, describing it as fully resolving chromatin accessibility at single-cell resolution, particularly at individual locus level, may overstate the level of detail currently achievable. We conclude that chromatin accessibility profiling at true single-cell, single-region resolution is challenging with current data sensitivity, but that it may be achieved with promising developments in optimizing the efficiency of scATAC-seq assays.

Indexed as

ChromatinSequence Analysis, DNASingle-Cell AnalysisHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansTransposasesChromatinTransposases

Identifiers

PMID40963104
PMCPMC12442292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.