Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40963072›Full record

ArticleMolecular biomedicine2025

Circulating tumor DNA as a marker of molecular residual disease in resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Cai-Yan Fang, Jing Wen, Jia-Di Wu, Zhi-Chao Li, Sheng Huang, Yan Huang, Ji-Yang Chen, Hui-Lin Su, Xiu-Ying Xie, Kong-Jia Luo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Immune biomarkers for head and neck cancer.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Cai-Yan Fang *State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, and, Department of Thoracic Surgery , Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Jing Wen *State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, and, Department of Thoracic Surgery , Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Jia-Di Wu *State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, and, Department of Thoracic Surgery , Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Zhi-Chao Li *State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, and, Department of Thoracic Surgery , Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Sheng Huang *State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, and, Department of Thoracic Surgery , Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Yan HuangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, and, Department of Thoracic Surgery , Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Ji-Yang ChenState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, and, Department of Thoracic Surgery , Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Hui-Lin SuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, and, Department of Thoracic Surgery , Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Xiu-Ying XieState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, and, Department of Thoracic Surgery , Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Kong-Jia LuoState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, and, Department of Thoracic Surgery , Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China. luokj@sysucc.org.cn.
Jian-Hua FuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, and, Department of Thoracic Surgery , Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China. fujh@sysucc.org.cn.
Hong YangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, and, Department of Thoracic Surgery , Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China. yanghong@sysucc.org.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6007-9086

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82273032Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2022A1515012217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains a major contributor to cancer-related mortality, with molecular residual disease (MRD) detection posing a significant challenge in post-surgical management. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in detecting MRD in patients with resectable ESCC undergoing radical surgery. A total of 62 primary tumor tissues, 108 preoperative, and 125 postoperative plasma samples were collected from 125 such ESCC patients who underwent radical surgery, and subjected to sequencing. Next-Generation Sequencing and ultra-high sensitivity Automated Triple Groom Sequencing panels were used to sequence genomic DNA from tumor tissues and ctDNA from plasma, respectively. ctDNA positive mutations included tumor-informed mutations and tumor-naïve mutations. Key findings revealed a high concordance rate of mutation detection between primary tumor tissue and preoperative plasma samples (91.11%, p = 0.62). Critically, the recurrence rate was higher in postoperative ctDNA-positive ESCCs than that in negative ones (66.67% (40/60) vs. 21.54% (14/65), p < 0.001). And postoperative ctDNA-positivity was associated with poorer disease-free survival (DFS) (hazard ratio (HR): 4.58, 95% CI: 2.65-7.92, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (HR: 5.39, 95% CI: 2.96-9.80, p < 0.001). Similar prognostic patterns were observed in patients with preoperative ctDNA-positivity (p = 0.014; p = 0.016; p = 0.071) and ctDNA-nonclearance (p < 0.001; p < 0.001; p < 0.001). Furthermore, in combination with postoperative ctDNA status, the Tumor-Node-Metastasis-Blood (TNMB) staging system was able to better distinguish patients with different prognoses compared with traditional TNM (p < 0.001). In conclusion, postoperative ctDNA-positivity emerges as a promising biomarker for detecting MRD in ESCC patients following surgical resection.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellCirculating Tumor DNAEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaNeoplasm, ResidualAdultAgedFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNABiomarkerCirculating cell-free DNACirculating tumor DNAEsophageal squamous cell carcinomaMolecular residual disease

Identifiers

PMID40963072
PMCPMC12443647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.