ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Egocentric video analysis for automated assessment of open surgical skills via deep learning.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross-Stream and Cross-Channel Attention Networks for Surgical Skill Classification in Open Surgery From Hand Kinematics.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWhile significant progress has been made in skill assessment for minimally invasive procedures, objective evaluation methods for open surgery remain limited. This paper presents a deep learning framework for assessing technical surgical skills using egocentric video data from open surgery training.
methodsOur dataset includes 201 videos and corresponding hand kinematics data from three fundamental training task-knot tying (KT), continuous suturing (CS), and interrupted suturing (IS)-performed by 20 participants. Each video was annotated by two experts using a modified OSATS scale (KT: five criteria, total score range: 5-25; CS/IS: seven criteria, total score range: 7-35). We evaluate three temporal architectures (LSTM, TCN, and Transformer), each using ResNet50 as the backbone for spatial feature extraction, and assess them under various training strategies: single-task learning, feature concatenation, pretraining, and multi-task learning with integrated kinematic data. Performance metrics included mean absolute error (MAE) and Spearman correlation coefficient (
resultsThe Transformer-based models consistently outperformed LSTM and TCN across all tasks. The multi-task Transformer incorporating prediction of task completion time (
conclusionThis research provides a foundation for objective, automated assessment of open surgical skills, with potential to improve the efficiency and standardization of surgical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40963049What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.