ArticleJournal of natural medicines2025
Rapid determination of heavy metals and arsenic in herbal medicines using energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry.
Article in Journal of natural medicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Heavy Metals Limit Test in the Japanese Pharmacopoeia is a chemical method used to detect the total amount of heavy metals based on Pb contents. However, determining the amounts of particular metals has become popular since the ICH-Q3D Guideline for Elemental Impurities was adopted. This is effectively performed using energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) analysis, an analytical method used to detect elements. In this study, we determined six elements (Cr, Cu, As, Cd, Hg, and Pb) in 25 herbal medicines using EDXRF and compared the quantitative values to those obtained using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The 25 herbal medicines used included 20 plants, two animals, and three minerals. EDXRF quantitative values for Cr, Cu, As, and Pb were obtained through calibration curve methods, whereas Cd and Hg were all below the limit of quantitation (10σ). Comparison of the quantitative values obtained via EDXRF and ICP-MS revealed ratios of 65-198%. The results for both methods were similar, with slightly larger differences observed for minerals between the EDXRF and ICP-MS quantitative values than those observed for plants. Some differences in quantitative values were observed in the comparison of six herbal medicines among different collection sites, owing to the environments in which Coptis rhizome and Mentha herb were grown. Furthermore, Longgu revealed significant elemental variations among the samples during simultaneous multi-elemental analysis. EDXRF enabled the easy and convenient determination of heavy metals in herbal medicines. Thus, it has potential applications in the quality control and evaluation of herbal medicines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40963030What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.