ArticleInsights into imaging2025
Novel ultrasound classification of tubal ectopic pregnancy: exploring underlying connections among sonographic and serum markers.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ovarian pregnancy: clinical characteristics, diagnostic challenges, and sonographic features-a multicenter case series with narrative literature overview.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to propose a novel ultrasound classification for tubal ectopic pregnancy (TEP) and explore relationships between sonographic features and serum markers. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted involving TEP patients, who were classified into two groups (simple gestational sac (GS)-like and complicated masses) based on ultrasound characteristics indicating a clear trophoblastic ring, hematosalpinx, or clear salpinx structure. Statistical comparisons and Spearman's rank correlation analyses were performed.
resultsIn this study, 320 women with TEP were classified into a simple GS-like mass group (n = 128) and a complicated mass group (n = 192). Compared with complicated masses, simple GS-like masses were smaller, had higher β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels, and higher color Doppler flow imaging grades (all p < 0.05). β-hCG was strongly correlated with mass size in simple GS-like mass cases (r = 0.720, p < 0.01), but weakly correlated in complicated mass cases (r = 0.211, p < 0.01). Hemoglobin levels were inversely correlated with pelvic free fluid depth in complicated masses (r = -0.344, p < 0.01).
conclusionsThe proposed ultrasound classification differentiates TEPs into subtypes with unique clinical and pathophysiological profiles. The variation in the correlation among sonographic indices and serum markers across TEP subtypes underscores the necessity for tailored clinical strategies. In simple GS-like masses, β-hCG and mass size are positively correlated, thus, clinical decisions could be made based on these two factors as recommended by guidelines. However, in complicated masses, β-hCG and mass size were poorly correlated, thus, the mass size should be deemphasized. Decisions should be made through comprehensive assessments under such circumstances. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The novel ultrasound-based classification proposed in this study differentiates tubal ectopic pregnancies into simple gestational-sac-like and complicated subtypes presenting with different correlations between sonographic indices and serum markers, which require tailored strategies in clinical settings. KEY POINTS: Addresses the lack of unified ultrasound classification for TEP. Different TEP types reveal distinct sonographic and serum profiles, with various relationships between them. This novel classification aids in tailored treatment and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.