ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025
The influence of genotype on the phenotype and prognosis of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Post-Mortem Biomarkers in Sudden Cardiac Death: From Classical Biochemistry to Molecular Autopsy and Multi-Omics Forensic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic Heart disease characterized by myocardial hypertrophy, which can lead to Heart failure and fatal arrhythmias. The genetic basis of this condition is complex, and its relationship with phenotype and prognosis is not completely understood. Our aim was to evaluate the influence of genotype on clinical and imaging phenotypes, and on a 2-year prognosis in HCM patients.Methods We included 117 HCM patients diagnosed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) between 2018 and 2024. Only 77 patients in the cohort underwent genetic testing and were included in the genetic analysis. Genetic testing results were classified as negative, variants of uncertain significance (VUS), or pathogenic, and correlated with clinical and imaging data. For prognosis, we analyzed major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and hospitalizations over 2 years.
resultsGenetic mutations (pathogenic or VUS) were identified in 55.9% of patients and were associated with greater symptom burden (p = 0.021). Both pathogenic and VUS carriers were more symptomatic than mutation-negative patients (p = 0.049 and p = 0.041), with no significant differences between the two groups. Patients with mutations also showed higher prevalence of LGE (p = 0.013), particularly those with pathogenic variants (p = 0.002). Compared to mutation-negative patients, both pathogenic and VUS carriers had more LGE (p = 0.007 and p = 0.005), while pathogenic variant carriers additionally demonstrated greater LV wall thickness (p = 0.042). During follow-up, pathogenic variant carriers had increased risk of MACE (HR 4.40, p < 0.001) and cardiovascular hospitalizations (HR 3.24, p = 0.033) versus mutation-negative patients. Family history of HCM or sudden cardiac death was associated with higher MACE risk (HR 2.33, p = 0.017; HR 3.23, p = 0.001). Patients with thin filament mutations, particularly TPM1, presented with worse imaging phenotypes and higher incidence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (80% vs. 0% in mutation-negative).
conclusionGenotype influences clinical and imaging phenotypes and short-term outcomes in HCM patients, underscoring the importance of genetic testing in risk stratification. However, small sample size limits conclusions about specific gene variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40962998What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.