Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40962979›Full record

ReviewNature2025

Addressing the safety of next-generation batteries.

Chuanbo Yang, Avtar Singh, Xiaofei Pu, Anudeep Mallarapu, Kandler Smith, Matt Keyser, Michael R Haberman, Hadi Khani, Pawel Misztal, Ryan Spray and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Thermal runaway-free Na-ion batteries.National science review · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chuanbo Yang *National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7961-9911
Avtar Singh *National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4043-8595
Xiaofei PuNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA.
Anudeep MallarapuNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA.
Kandler SmithNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA.
Matt KeyserNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA.
Michael R HabermanWalker Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7159-9773
Hadi KhaniWalker Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Pawel MisztalMaseeh Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Ryan SprayExponent, Inc., Natick, MA, USA.
Ofodike A EzekoyeWalker Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Donal P Finegan *National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA. donal.finegan@nrel.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-4633-560X

Funding

US Department of Energy DE- AC36-08GO28308US DOE Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy DE-AR00001723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owing to increasing demand for low-cost energy storage with secure material supply chains, the battery community is approaching a pivotal shift beyond conventional lithium-ion (Li-ion) towards next-generation cells. Technologies that include alkali-metal anodes, solid electrolytes and earth-abundant materials such as sodium (Na) and sulfur (S) are reaching commercialization in cells. The abuse tolerance and thermal runaway hazards of such technologies diverge from conventional Li-ion cells. Consequently, designing safe batteries with next-generation materials requires a holistic approach to characterize cells and to understand their responses to abuse conditions from the beginning to the end of life. Here we provide a Perspective on how the safety and abuse tolerance of cells are likely to change for up-and-coming technologies; challenges and opportunities for reimagining safe cell and battery designs; gaps in our knowledge; capabilities for understanding the hazards of thermal runaway and how to address them; how standard abuse tests may need to adapt to new challenges; and how research needs to support affected professionals, from pack designers to first responders, to manage hazards and ensure safe roll-out of next-generation cells into applications like electric vehicles (EVs). Finally, given the large number of next-generation technologies being explored, we encourage giving priority to safety-focused research in proportion to the rate of manufacturing scale-up of each specific technology.

Indexed as

Electric Power SuppliesSafetyElectrodesHumansLithiumLithium

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.