Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40962965›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

Optimeet: A computational tool to enhance participant attendance in group research.

Lukas W Mayer, Desislava Bocheva, Joanne Hinds, Olivia Brown, Lukasz Piwek, David A Ellis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lukas W MayerDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, UCI School of Social Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA.
Desislava BochevaDecisions and Operations Division, School of Management, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Joanne HindsDecisions and Operations Division, School of Management, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK. J.Hinds@bath.ac.uk.
Olivia BrownDecisions and Operations Division, School of Management, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Lukasz PiwekDecisions and Operations Division, School of Management, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
David A EllisDecisions and Operations Division, School of Management, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across disciplines, research often relies on groups of people to participate in experiments or attend events at the same time. Typically, researchers try to maximize attendance by manually identifying a set of times that suit the diaries of many individuals. However, this is inefficient, is prone to error, and can lead to a final sample that is not large enough to provide meaningful inferences. While current scheduling tools are useful for individual-based research, enabling participants to select times convenient to them within a researcher's preset parameters, they are less useful in research that requires specific or flexible group sizes. In response, we present Optimeet, a web application that allows researchers to upload participants' availability data and generate an optimal allocation schedule for multiple groups. We describe the function of the underlying applet, which identifies a schedule to maximize attendance by treating it as a computational problem involving combinatorial optimization (Experiment 1). Our solution relies on an empirical comparison of parameter-free heuristics to make allocation decisions that make the best use of participants' availabilities and the derivation of appropriate performance metrics. Of the algorithms evaluated, one consistently outperformed comparable versions of existing tools, which we verified in a further exercise (Experiment 2) involving a large human sample (N = 5,289). We consider the methodological utility and practical value of these developments, and include detailed documentation, code, and a video tutorial so that researchers can rapidly employ Optimeet to support group research.

Indexed as

Group ProcessesSoftwareAlgorithmsHumansInternetResearch DesignGroup researchParticipant recruitment and schedulingSimulationStatistical power

Identifiers

PMID40962965
PMCPMC12443933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.