Observational studySurgical endoscopy2025
Defining benchmarks for postoperative mobilization based on the recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program for liver surgery: a prospective study.
Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of inhaled lavender essential oil on sleep quality, pain, and anxiety in ICU patients after curative hepatocellular carcinoma resection: a quasi-experimental study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes and short-term recovery profiles of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly mobilization is a core component of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol, aiming to accelerate recovery and reduce postoperative complications. In the context of liver surgery, early mobilization is supposed to be associated with improved outcomes, yet the specific influence of timepoint and duration of mobilization remains unexplored. This study seeks to evaluate benchmarks of early mobilization within a structured ERAS program according to the ERAS guidelines to establish evidence-based recommendations for its timing and duration.
methodsA prospective observational study was conducted on 1,076 patients undergoing liver surgery within an ERAS protocol that strictly followed the official ERAS Society recommendations. Mobilization data were collected from postoperative day (POD) 0 through POD 3 for specific liver resections, such as hepatectomy, limited liver resections, and comparisons between open (OR) and minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS). Two patient groups were defined based on the presence or absence of a textbook outcome (TO): Patients who achieved a TO were defined as no complications, no prolonged hospital stay, no readmissions, and no mortality (n = 261) vs. Patients who did not (n = 715; control group).
resultsPatients without complications, across all types of liver resections, were mobilized on POD 1, POD 2, and POD 3 for a median of 2 h (IQR 1-4), 4 h (2-6), and 5 h (4-7), respectively. This duration was significantly longer than in patients who experienced any type of postoperative complications (p < 0.001). A MILS right hepatectomy was associated with significantly shorter mobilization times on POD1 to POD3-2 h (1-3), 3 h (2-4), and 4 h (3-6), respectively-compared to a MILS segmentectomy, which showed mobilization times of 2 h (2-4), 4 h (3-6), and 6 h (4-7). In general, mobilization was 2 h longer in patients that underwent MILS in comparison to OR (p < 0.001). Shorter surgeries starting earlier in the day facilitated early mobilization on POD 0 (p < 0.001).
conclusionOur findings highlight the importance of postoperative mobilization and define cut-offs for the type of liver resection from easy to complex. However, applying a uniform cutoff for all types of liver resections appears more than questionable, given the procedure-specific differences in postoperative mobilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.