Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40962904›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative evaluation of deep learning and traditional models for predicting traffic accident severity in Saudi Arabia.

Fayez Alanazi, Ibrahim Khalil Umar, Ahmed M Yosri, Mohamed Ahmed Okail

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fayez AlanaziDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Jouf University, 72388, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim Khalil UmarDepartment of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Babura, Nigeria.
Ahmed M YosriDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Jouf University, 72388, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed Ahmed OkailFaculty of Engineering and Technology, Badr University in Cairo (BUC), Cairo, 11829, Egypt. Mohamed.Okail@buc.edu.eg.

Funding

Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at JOUF University DGSSR-2024-02-01036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Road traffic accidents are one of the leading death causes around the globe, claiming millions of lives every year. Predicting traffic accident severity is essential for road users' safety and accident prevention. Artificial neural network (ANN), Boosted trees (BRT), Support vector machine (SVM), Naïve Bayes (NVB), and logistic regression (LGR) were employed for predicting fatal accidents in 14 cities in the Eastern Province of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia using accident data from the year 2018-2022. The accident data was classified into fatal and injury accidents. A total of 9,548 accident cases involving 17,100 vehicles resulting in 2,527 fatalities and 8,020 injuries during this period, with 28% of the cases occurring in Al-Ahsa. The ANN model outperformed all five models with an accuracy = 99.91%, sensitivity = 99.94%, specificity = 99.8%, G-mean = 99.87%, and AUC = 99.92%. The ANN could improve the performance of LGR by up to 13.60% in the validation phase. For understanding the impact of each of the input parameters, three different relevance-ranking algorithms (maximum relevance minimum redundancy, Kruskal Wallis and Chi-square) were used prior to the development of the models and the result shows the number of people involved and the number of people injured as the major factors increasing the severity of road traffic accidents.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficDeep LearningAlgorithmsBayes TheoremHumansLogistic ModelsNeural Networks, ComputerSaudi ArabiaSupport Vector MachineWounds and InjuriesAccident severityFatalityMachine learning methodsSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID40962904
PMCPMC12443991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.