ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative evaluation of deep learning and traditional models for predicting traffic accident severity in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of XGBoost, TabNet, and FT transformer models for fatal crash prediction under extreme class imbalance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the level of responsibility in pedestrian crashes using machine learning algorithms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Road traffic accidents are one of the leading death causes around the globe, claiming millions of lives every year. Predicting traffic accident severity is essential for road users' safety and accident prevention. Artificial neural network (ANN), Boosted trees (BRT), Support vector machine (SVM), Naïve Bayes (NVB), and logistic regression (LGR) were employed for predicting fatal accidents in 14 cities in the Eastern Province of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia using accident data from the year 2018-2022. The accident data was classified into fatal and injury accidents. A total of 9,548 accident cases involving 17,100 vehicles resulting in 2,527 fatalities and 8,020 injuries during this period, with 28% of the cases occurring in Al-Ahsa. The ANN model outperformed all five models with an accuracy = 99.91%, sensitivity = 99.94%, specificity = 99.8%, G-mean = 99.87%, and AUC = 99.92%. The ANN could improve the performance of LGR by up to 13.60% in the validation phase. For understanding the impact of each of the input parameters, three different relevance-ranking algorithms (maximum relevance minimum redundancy, Kruskal Wallis and Chi-square) were used prior to the development of the models and the result shows the number of people involved and the number of people injured as the major factors increasing the severity of road traffic accidents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.