Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40962811›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Cerebellar dentate nucleus lesions in monkey reveal both a motor-cognitive dichotomy and within-cognition dichotomy of dorsal vs ventral stream processing.

Jeremy D Schmahmann, Ronald D Killiany, Mark Vangel, Tara L Moore, Mark B Moss, Douglas L Rosene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeremy D SchmahmannAtaxia Center, Division of Behavioral Neurology and Integrated Brain Medicine, Laboratory for Neuroanatomy and Cerebellar Neurobiology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02114, MA, USA. jschmahmann@mgh.harvard.edu.
Ronald D KillianyBoston University, Avedisian School of Medicine, Chobanian, Boston, 02118, MA, USA.
Mark VangelBiostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02114, MA, USA.
Tara L MooreBoston University, Avedisian School of Medicine, Chobanian, Boston, 02118, MA, USA.
Mark B MossBoston University, Avedisian School of Medicine, Chobanian, Boston, 02118, MA, USA.
Douglas L RoseneBoston University, Avedisian School of Medicine, Chobanian, Boston, 02118, MA, USA.

Funding

Cognitive Effects of Cerebellar Lesions in HumansR01MH067980 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SCHMAHMANN, JEREMY D · 2003 to 2006
$2.0M
National Institutes of Mental Health RO1 MH067980NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH067980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dysmetria of thought theory holds that the cerebellum is an integral node in the distributed neural circuits subserving cognition. We tested this theory in four rhesus monkeys with bilateral lesions in cerebellar dentate nuclei (DN), targeting ventral sectors linked with cerebral association cortices engaged in cognitive processing. Lesion localization was confirmed by MRI and histology. DN animals and controls were assessed for motor dexterity (Kuypers' Task), attention, three-choice discrimination, recognition memory (Delayed Non-Matching to Sample task [DNMS]), working memory (Delayed Recognition Span Task [DRST]) and executive function (Conceptual Set Shifting Task [CSST]). Performance by the DN animals was not significantly different than controls on the Kuypers' task and DNMS, but as a group they were impaired on DRST and CSST. DN monkeys achieved shorter spans on DRST. Their responses on CSST were more perseverative, and larger lesions produced greater deficits. This study provides the first empirical support for anatomical and functional MRI evidence of a motor-cognitive dichotomy in the cerebellar dentate nucleus. It highlights a within-cognition dichotomy in which cerebellum modulates dorsal stream cognitive functions (spatial awareness; dynamic actions of where and how) characterized by executive functions including working memory but is not engaged in ventral stream cognitive processes (static actions of object identification) exemplified by recognition memory.

Indexed as

Cerebellar NucleiCognitionAnimalsAttentionExecutive FunctionFemaleMacaca mulattaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory, Short-TermCerebellar cognitionConceptual set shifting taskDelayed non-matching to sample taskDelayed recognition span taskDysmetria of thoughtKuypers’ taskLesion deficit correlationMental flexibility

Identifiers

PMID40962811
PMCPMC12443958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.