ArticleNature communications2025
RBM39 degrader invigorates innate immunity to eradicate neuroblastoma despite cancer cell plasticity.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting PRMT5 Inhibitor-Induced Adaptation in Pancreatic Cancer with the RBM39 Degrader Indisulam.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- RNA-binding proteins and ribonucleoproteins as determinants of immunity.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026Review
- Targeting "undruggable" cancer proteins: pharmacological challenges and emerging strategies.Translational cancer research · 2026Review
- Review
- Management of persistent soft tissue residuals exhibiting an imaging paradox (^123I-MIBG-negative/^68Ga-DOTA-NOC-positive) in high-risk neuroblastoma following immunotherapy: a case report.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- RNA-binding motif proteins as context-dependent regulators of tumor-immune crosstalk, genome stability, and therapeutic vulnerabilities in cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Transcriptomic and epigenetic profiling of neuroblastoma states in response to RBM39 degrader.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cellular plasticity of neuroblastoma is defined by a mixture of two major cell states, adrenergic and mesenchymal, which may contribute to therapy resistance. However, how neuroblastoma cells switch cellular states during therapy remains largely unknown, and how to eradicate neuroblastoma regardless of its cell state is a clinical challenge. To better understand the cellular plasticity of neuroblastoma in chemoresistance, we define the transcriptomic and epigenetic map of adrenergic and mesenchymal types of neuroblastomas using human and murine models treated with indisulam, a selective RBM39 degrader. We show that cancer cells not only undergo a bidirectional switch between adrenergic and mesenchymal states, but also acquire additional cellular states, reminiscent of the developmental pliancy of neural crest cells. These cell state alterations are coupled with epigenetic reprogramming and dependency switching of cell state-specific transcription factors, epigenetic modifiers, and targetable kinases. Through targeting RNA splicing, indisulam induces an inflammatory tumor microenvironment and enhances the anticancer activity of natural killer cells. The combination of indisulam with anti-GD2 immunotherapy results in a durable, complete response in high-risk transgenic neuroblastoma models, providing an innovative, rational therapeutic approach to eradicate tumor cells regardless of their potential to switch cell states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.