ArticleChemMedChem2025
Rational Design and Antimycobacterial Evaluation of Aryl Sulfonamide-Linked Isoniazid Hydrazones Against Mycobacterium Tuberculosis.
Article in ChemMedChem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of Isoniazid-Pyrazole Hybrids as Potential Antitubercular Agents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Rational Design and Antimycobacterial Evaluation of Aryl Sulfonamide-Linked Isoniazid Hydrazones Against Mycobacterium Tuberculosis.ChemMedChem · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite significant advancements in antituberculosis (TB) drug discovery, considerable scope remains for novel therapeutic development. Molecular hybridization represents a promising strategy for generating new anti-TB agents. In this study, in silico molecular docking is employed to design novel isoniazid-sulfonamide hybrids connected via a hydrazone bridge, designated as series 7j-r and 8a-i. Docking analysis reveals that these compounds interact significantly with the active site of InhA, particularly engaging the catalytic triad residues Y158, F149, and K165, as well as the cofactor NAD. Subsequently, both series are synthesized and evaluated against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Generally, compounds from both series (7 and 8) exhibit enhanced activity compared to their precursors. Notably, compound 8a demonstrated approximately twofold greater potency ( minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) = 0.156 µg mL
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.