ArticleKorean journal of orthodontics2025
Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of alveolar bone and root changes after clear aligner therapy with different extraction protocols: Balancing tissue loss, tooth control, and treatment alternatives.
Article in Korean journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate changes in alveolar bone and tooth root dimensions in anterior teeth of patients with different tooth extraction types undergoing clear aligner therapy (CAT) and to provide reliable information for preventing tissue loss and providing tooth control in severe cases through a large-scale sample analysis of the clinical outcomes of CAT. Methods: We selected 281 patients (186 non-extraction [NE], 59 with two-premolar extraction [TPE] in both the maxilla and mandible, and 36 with TPE in the maxilla and one lower-incisor extraction [OLIE] in the mandible) from the records of recent three years. Quantitative changes in the dentoalveolar apparatus were analyzed using pre- (T1) and post-treatment (T2) cone-beam computed tomography. The measured parameters included the alveolar bone height and thickness, and root length in the anterior teeth in different types of tooth extraction. Results: Alveolar bone height loss was common in all groups after CAT. Compared to patients with NE, patients with TPE showed a higher risk of lingual bone dehiscence and torque loss ( Conclusions: Different tooth extraction types can lead to different degrees of bone loss in the direction of tooth movement, and orthodontists should adopt more cautious measures for mandibular anterior teeth. Despite numerous experimental studies for improving techniques and designs in CAT, tooth control and complication prevention in extraction cases remain challenging for orthodontists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.