ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Enhancing senior physician-led multidisciplinary team rounds to improve patient care at Wallaga University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, 2025.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research trends and emerging topics in antifungal therapeutic drug monitoring: a bibliometric analysis with implications for clinical pharmacy practice.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe healthcare system is facing challenges due to insufficient multidisciplinary collaboration, leading to gaps in treatment, compromised patient safety and increased medical errors. Poor communication can cause misunderstandings, delays in critical decisions and cost escalation. Implementing multidisciplinary team (MDT) rounds, led by a senior physician, can improve communication, streamline decision-making and improve patient care.
methodsA multidimensional interventional study was conducted to address the identified problem. A fishbone diagram was used to identify the root causes of the problem. A driver diagram was developed to outline the key drivers and change concepts necessary for achieving the desired outcomes. Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were implemented to test and refine interventions systematically.
interventionA daily dashboard-based performance audit was implemented, which includes the status of MDT rounds recorded by unit heads and analysed by the Hospital SBFR Taskforce team. Both morning and evening round statuses from various service units are collected for review of the data and communication with department heads prior to morning sessions. The report is shared in a common Telegram group for accessibility among hospital leaders. Each service unit engages in discussions with their MDT every Friday, while a weekly SBFR forum takes place every Tuesday, attended by directors and representatives from service units to review weekly performance. On-site MDT supportive supervision is conducted as needed.
resultsSenior physician engagement has significantly improved overall, as evidenced by the average score rising from 49% to 81%. Furthermore, 94% of participants agreed that senior-led MDT rounds were good for teamwork, professional development and discussion quality. Additionally, improvements in patient outcomes and decision-making were acknowledged by 80% of respondents and 97% of participants, respectively.
conclusionsThe study indicates that senior-led MDT rounds enhance discussion quality, team collaboration, decision-making, patient outcomes and professional growth. To maintain MDT rounds, daily performance audits, clinical audits and continuous monitoring using common communication platforms are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.