Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40962341›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Advocates, Academics, Survivors and Clinicians to END Intimate Partner Violence (ASCEND-IPV) initiative: a prospective observational case-control study protocol to identify plasma biomarkers of intimate partner violence (IPV)-caused brain injury (BI).

Megan I Harper, Kelly McKinney, Caroline McLennan, Shambhu P Adhikari, Mohammad Ghodsi, Jennifer G Cooper, Sophie Stukas, Naomi Maldonado-Rodroguez, Andrew Agbay, Tessa Morelli and 15 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Megan I HarperThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Kelly McKinneyVancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada.
Caroline McLennanThe University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Shambhu P AdhikariThe University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Mohammad GhodsiThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jennifer G CooperThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sophie StukasThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Naomi Maldonado-RodroguezThe University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Andrew AgbayThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Tessa MorelliThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Setareh Nouri Zadeh-TehraniThe University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Bradi R LorenzThe University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Krystal RothlanderThe University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Jonathan D SmirlUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Colin WallaceOkanagan College, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Georgia F SymonsVancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada.
Justin BrandUniversity of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Brian R ChristieThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jodie GawrylukUniversity of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Aimee FalkenbergVancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada.
Hannah VartoEmbrace Clinic, Fraser Health Authority, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada.
Karen MasonSupporting Survivors of Abuse and Brain Injury through Research, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Sandy R ShultzVancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada.
Paul van DonkelaarThe University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Cheryl Lea WellingtonThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada cheryl.wellington@ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7014-039X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough as many as 92% of survivors of physical intimate partner violence (IPV) report impacts to the head and/or non-fatal strangulation (NFS) that raise clinical suspicion of brain injury (BI), there are no evidence-based methods to document and characterise BI in this vulnerable population, limited clinical practice guidelines and insufficient understanding about long-term risks for conditions including Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD). This leaves most survivors of IPV-caused BI (IPV-BI), overwhelmingly women, without adequate access to medical care and support, safe housing, back-to-school/work accommodations or follow-up care for long-term neurocognitive health. Although traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an established ADRD risk factor, little is known about the attributable risk of ADRD due to IPV-BI, particularly in women. METHODS OF ANALYSIS: Our overarching objectives are to (1) use plasma biomarkers as novel tools to assist clinicians to improve diagnosis of IPV-BI at the acute, subacute and chronic stages in a manner sensitive to the needs of this vulnerable population and (2) raise awareness of the importance of considering IPV-BI as a potential ADRD risk factor. A prospective observational study funded by the US Department of Defense (HT9425-24-1-0462), Brain Canada (6200) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (523320-NWT-CAAA-37499) leverages collaborative research at multiple clinical sites in British Columbia to maximise equity, diversity and inclusion among participants, with a target enrolment of n=600 participants.The Advocates, Academics, Survivors and Clinicians to END Intimate Partner Violence Biomarkers study, which is predicated on pre-specified research questions, represents one of the most significant community-based studies on plasma biomarkers affected by an IPV-BI incident. Of particular significance is the fact our study uses robust biomarker approaches being applied in the TBI and ADRD fields to determine how the biomarker profile after IPV-BI compares to typical TBI and the early stage of neurodegenerative disorders. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board (H24-01990, H22-02241 and H16-02792) and the Island Health Research Ethics Board (H22-03510). Upon publication of primary papers, de-identified data and biospecimens will be made widely available, including the US Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research (FITBIR) federated database. Our data and integrated knowledge translation activities with persons with lived experience of IPV-BI and those working in the healthcare sector will be synthesised into co-designed and implemented knowledge tools to improve outcomes for survivors of IPV-BI.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesIntimate Partner ViolenceAdultBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvivorsBiomarkersBrain InjuriesDementiaGender-Based Violence

Identifiers

PMID40962341
PMCPMC12443190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.